This book deals with an ongoing debate between Calvinist and Non-Calvinist. For over 400 years these two groups have went back and forth on issues such as Election is it Conditional or Unconditional. The issue of the saving grace of God is it resistible or irresistible. Scholars from both sides have waxed eloquent biblically supporting their view, while at the same time presenting sound chases to dismantle the opposing view. That's the problem though isn't it? Both sides are winning and losing at the same time. Nobody wins, it's a draw!
What happens if instead of comparing one system against the opposing system, we examined each systematic view against the scripture? That's what this book does, examines each view with scripture.
Which view or views were able to withstand scriptural scruntiny?
