As innovations in military technologies race toward ever-greater levels of automation and autonomy, debates over the ethics of violent technologies tread water. Death Machines reframes these debates, arguing that the way we conceive of the ethics of contemporary warfare is itself imbued with a set of bio-technological rationalities that work as limits. The task for critical thought must therefore be to unpack, engage, and challenge these limits. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt, the book offers a close reading of the technology-biopolitics-complex that informs and produces contemporary subjectivities, highlighting the perilous implications this has for how we think about the ethics of political violence, both now and in the future.

Are lethal drones the most moral and effective tools to combat terrorism? Could killer robots take lives more ethically than humans? Discussion of these issues often ends up conflating efficiency with morality and legality with ethics.

This book raises urgent questions about what is at work in the relationship between lethal technologies, their uses and the ethical justifications for technologically enabled political violence. It explores what allows us to think of instruments for killing as inherently ethical, what are the socio-political rationale underpins these processes, and what kind of ethical framework for violence such a socio-political context produces.

Death Machines redefines the debate, arguing that the way we conceive of the ethics of contemporary warfare is itself imbued with a set of bio-technological rationalities that work as limits. We must unpack, engage and challenge these limits. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt the book offers a close reading of the technology-biopolitics complex that informs and produces contemporary subjectivities, highlighting the grave implications this has for how we think about the ethics of political violence, both now and in the future.